<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there a future for Current.tv?</title>
	<link>http://TechUntangled.com/is-there-a-future-for-currenttv</link>
	<description>Commentary on Technology and Business</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: GoreHub</title>
		<link>http://TechUntangled.com/is-there-a-future-for-currenttv#comment-29</link>
		<author>GoreHub</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://TechUntangled.com/is-there-a-future-for-currenttv#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but CurrentTV is already profitable. They have much lower production costs than most television networks, and they are the only channel bridging the gap between users and networks. Go Al!

http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/117/features-gore.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but CurrentTV is already profitable. They have much lower production costs than most television networks, and they are the only channel bridging the gap between users and networks. Go Al!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/117/features-gore.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/117/features-gore.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
